adamsarticles.com adamsarticles.com
   Index Page :> About Us :> Privacy of Info :> ToS :> Place Your Link :> Add Article
Search:   
Free 3 way links
 

Property & Agents

Adventure & Sports

Travel & Accommodation

Online Shopping

Business & Services

Employment & Careers

Issues & News

Hygiene & Health

Medicine & Treatment

Automotive

Art & Culture

Fashion & Lifestyle

Computers & Software

Recreation

Science & Research

Politics & Government

Academics & Learning

Self Enhancement

Society & Issues

Home Family & Garden

Food & Recipe

Teens & Children

Finance & Banking

Online & Board Games

 

  Index Page » Finance & Banking » Investment
   
 

The Conflict of Interest Game

   

Disgruntled investors are going after Wall Street once again, this time accusing one of investment bank Morgan-Stanley's high-tech mutual funds of making biased stock picks.

Recent lawsuits allege the Morgan Stanley Technology fund was influenced to buy and hold stocks of companies that delivered huge investment banking fees - or could potentially bring big business - to the investment bank.

According to the lawsuits, the Morgan Stanley fund followed the biased recommendations of the firm's analysts - decisions that have cost shareholders millions of dollars since the portfolio's October 2000 inception.

The fund lost 48 percent in 2001 and was down another 50 percent during the first nine months of 2002. While Morgan Stanley strongly denied the allegations, I fail to see how the management of the fund is somehow distinct from the other divisions of Morgan Stanley. Ultimately, they all work for the same boss.

The suits further claim that the tech fund failed to disclose that the firm had investment banking ties with a number of companies whose stocks were part of the portfolio. They also failed to reveal that those links could affect the fund's buy or sell calls.

Why bring all this up? For one thing, it is interesting to note that Morgan Stanley offered four of these types of funds in October 2000. Just around the time when we sold all of our positions (Oct. 13, 2000) and it became clear, at least to those of us who were tracking long-term trends, that a major trend change had taken place.

More recently in the news it's been Merrill Lynch who had a questionable deal involving transactions with failed energy trader Enron. Of course, the financial services industry regulates itself so well, that an $80 million payment to the SEC is sufficient to wrap up this case without admitting or denying wrongdoing.

What's the moral of this story? While it is impossible to predict these alleged conflict of interest schemes, it is definitely possible to follow a disciplined approach and be on the right side of the market so you can avoid jumping aboard a sinking ship.

Author: Ulli Niemann
 
Author Bio:
Ulli Niemann is a famous writer. Ulli likes to scribble articles about this topic.
This article can be searched using: real estate investment, real estate finance and investment, best money investment
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Mortgage Interest Rates: How to Qualify for the Lowest Mortgage Rate
 
Your Mother Could Make Money In Forex Trading
 
Refinance Home Mortgage Loans with Poor Credit - Reduce Monthly Bills with a Refi Loan
 
Helpful Tips for Purchasing an Online Debt Collection Software
 
Jim Rogers Forecasts Higher Oil, Gas and Uranium Prices
 
Low Interest Credit Cards Offer Shrewd Savings
 
Free Debt Consolidation
 
Avail Ready Finance For Business Through Quick Commercial Loans
 
The Iraqi Dinar In A Nutshell
 
Low Fee Payday Loans
 
 
 
Index Page :> Privacy of Info :> ToS  
© 2006-2008 www.adamsarticles.com All Rights Reserved Worldwide.